“Constitutional guarantees cannot be compromised by vicissitudes of technology”, he observed. In an emphatic dissent from the majority, Justice Chandrachud has held the entire Aadhar project to be unconstitutional….

The very act of passing the Aadhaar Act 2016 as a money bill was held to be unconstitutional by Justice Chandrachud, dissenting from the majority view expressed through Justice Sikri’s judgment that there was no impropriety in introducing it as  money bill
“The passing Aadhaar Act as money bill is a fraud on the constitution”, Justice Chandrachud observed. The decision of Speaker to classify a bill as money bill is amenable to judicial review. The judgment also highlighted the importance of Rajya Sabha…

Violates informational privacy, data protection; There is potential for surveillance. The Aadhaar project was held to be violative of informational privacy, data protection. “Constitutional guarantees cannot be compromised by vicissitudes of technology”, he observed….

Holding that Aadhaar had potential for surveillance, it was stated that the architecture posed risk on potential violation of leakage of database. Source code is of foreign corporation. “The data must all the time vest with the individual”, said the

Holding that Aadhaar had potential for surveillance, it was stated that the architecture posed risk on potential violation of leakage of database. Source code is of foreign corporation. “The data must all the time vest with the individual”, said the …

Read more

LEAVE A REPLY